Mid-Decade Redistricting

Partisan Lean and Shift of 2026 Districts based on the 2024 Presidential Margin

Redistricting Effectiveness and Delegation Changes

Evaluating district-level and state-level effectiveness of gerrymandering, including likelihood of successful flips of targeted seats, against the 2026 electoral environment and a neutral environment.

Redistricting Effectiveness of Individual Districts

Flip probability and margin shift magnitude across individually redrawn congressional seats.

Active Environment: 2026 Midterm (D+8.0)

State-Level Delegation Changes

Expected value of net seat change against the target of each gerrymandered state.

Active Environment: 2026 Midterm (D+8.0)

Methodology and Metrics Explained(WORK IN PROGRESS - IGNORE FOR NOW)

Partisan Index

Measures the baseline partisan environment of each district. It is computed as a weighted blend of the reallocated 2024 presidential margin and the re-tabulated 2020 presidential return, normalized against national popular vote baselines:

Index = (0.70 × 2024 Pres. Margin Normalized) + (0.30 × 2020 Pres. Margin Normalized)

Reported to 1 decimal place as a signed rating (e.g., D +8.5 or R +55.9). Positive values denote a Democratic advantage; negative values denote a Republican advantage.

Gerrymander Effectiveness & Durability (GES)

Quantifies how reliably a redraw flips or retains a seat across different national political climates using a logistic win-probability function (σ = 5.5%):

GES = 200 × (P_win - 0.50)

Truncated to [-50, +100]. Positive values indicate an effective gerrymander (>50% win probability), zero represents a toss-up, and negative values denote vulnerability to seat loss during adverse wave conditions.

Edge-Case Handling & Jungle Primaries

Standard two-party general elections do not occur in all seats. To prevent mathematical distortions, we apply a strict 3-tier hierarchy[cite: 2]:

  • Standard Contest: Signed two-party margin: (Dem - Rep) / (Dem + Rep)[cite: 2].
  • Top-Two / Jungle Primaries (CA & WA): In general contests between members of the same party (D vs D or R vs R), we aggregate all Democratic vs. Republican votes cast during the all-party primary stage as the benchmark[cite: 2].
  • Unopposed / Uncontested: When a major party fielded no candidate, the 2024 Presidential Margin is imputed as the true partisan floor[cite: 2]. Non-standard races are flagged with an asterisk (*)[cite: 2].

Impact on Targeted Districts

Definitions for the topline metrics in the default sidebar overview[cite: 2]:

  • Mean Partisan Shift: The absolute average shift (|Margin Shift|) across all targeted boundaries, measuring the raw magnitude of the cartographic changes[cite: 2].
  • Median Partisan Lean: The median partisan lean of all targeted seats, indicating the center of gravity of the redrawn maps[cite: 2].
  • Mean Partisan Shift (Net): The directional signed mean (Σ Margin Shift / N), revealing which party captured net territory overall[cite: 2].
  • Median New District: The exact median seat when sorting all altered districts by post-redistricting presidential margin[cite: 2].

Tipping Point & Seat Advantage

Calculates chamber-control thresholds and spatial seat bias across the 435 U.S. House seats[cite: 2]:

  • Tipping Point District: The 218th seat when ranking all 435 congressional districts from most Democratic to most Republican[cite: 2]. If a party wins the tipping point seat, they secure the House majority[cite: 2].
  • Generic Ballot Advantage (Seat Bias): Measures systemic cartographic tilt by subtracting the national popular vote share from the majority party's projected seat share[cite: 2]:
    Advantage = (Seats Won / 435) - National 2-Party Vote Share